During
this week’s (December 7) annual debate on the UK fishing industry, many topics came under
scrutiny including the health of the marine environment. It prompted a cordial exchange between two Labour MPs, Ben Bradshaw (Exeter) and Melanie Onn (Great Grimsby. This is what they said
I do not know whether you have had an opportunity to watch the wonderful BBC series Blue Planet 2, Madam Deputy Speaker. If you have, you will have been inspired and moved by the wondrousness of our marine environment, but also by its vulnerability and fragility. While environmental degradation on land is visible to us - we see forests and species disappear, and we see desertification - what has been happening in our oceans for far too long has remained invisible to all except a dedicated band of marine scientists and divers.
Now, thanks to that fantastic programme, it is
there for all of us to see.
When my right hon. Friend watched that programme, was he as concerned as I was by the amount of plastic being ingested by some of the marine life that later goes into our food chain?
Mr
Bradshaw
Indeed I was.
Thankfully, plastics are one of the
more visible aspects of marine pollution. We see them washed up on our beaches
and the Government is taking action, but
a great deal else that goes on is still invisible.
There is another big difference
between land-based and sea-based environmental degradation.
The sea is a place where the ancient
human activity of hunting and gathering continues, and continues apace.
As has just been pointed out by my
hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby, (other human
activity, such as the use of plastics, has its impacts, but much of it is
invisible.
Man-made climate change is leading
to the warming and acidification of our
oceans, with yet unknown consequences.
It does not affect just marine life
- including fish, as an edible resource - but the roles that the oceans
themselves play in regulating our climate, our oxygen levels, and basically
everything that makes human life on earth possible.
For most of human history, oceans
and fish were simply plundered.
That did not matter when there were
relatively few human beings and fishing technology was relatively antiquated,
but, in the last 100 years or so, population growth and technological progress
have completely changed that equation, with, in some instances, devastating
consequences.
We all know the story of the
near-eradication of bluefin tuna, turtles, cod off the north-east coast of the United
States, and, in our own case, cod in the North
Sea.
However, things have changed.
Because of what was going on in the early noughties, politicians began to take
notice and take action.
There was collective endeavour, and
it has worked.
North Sea cod
has made a fantastic recovery, thanks to the difficult measures and decisions
that I took as a Fisheries minister, which were massively criticised by the
fishing industry at the time.
There has even been progress on the
high seas, which is much more difficult because of the lack of an international
legal framework.
As anyone - I hope - can appreciate,
managing our seas and fish stocks sustainably demands that countries work
together.
As has been said so often during our
debates over the years, fish do not respect national borders; they swim about.
I have real concerns about the
potential of Brexit to reverse the welcome progress that we have seen in the
last 15 or 20 years.
Let us be honest: the status quo is not a disaster. My local
ports, Brixham and Plymouth, have
just reported their best years in terms of the value of their catches.
Species such as cuttlefish are doing
incredibly well, and are being exported straight to markets in Italy,
France and Spain.
Our crab and lobster are also valuable exports.
* The fishing debate in full: www.grimsbynews.blogspot.co.uk
* The fishing debate in full: www.grimsbynews.blogspot.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment